| Strangers in a
Strange Land
2 Samuel 7:1-14(a)
Ephesians 2:11-22
Rockville United Church
Frank Molony
July 23, 2006
Are you now or have you ever been an ALIEN? Several years ago, when
Stefan Axmacher was much younger, Ann Seltz recounted an evening
in which Stefan asked her if she believed in aliens. When Ann said
she probably did not, Stefan was deeply troubled: “Well, on
TV I just saw the government was stopping them at the border.”
We’re not talking this morning about aliens from outer space
that Stefan passionately hoped existed. That’s not the kind
of alien we are considering this morning. Borrowing the title from
Heinlein’s novel of the sixties—have you been Strangers
in a Strange Land? If we listen to the readings for this week as
suggested in the Lectionary, we will be challenged—because
central to our religious, faith heritage is the awareness that “we”—the
living church, the holy house where God may be encountered—we
all have been aliens, strangers, foreigners. Do we believe that?
Do we remember that?
Reflections on the reading
from II Samuel
David wanted to build for the Lord, Yahweh,
a temple. As a king newly comes into his royal city, David himself
enjoyed a palace. No longer was he a shepherd out in the fields.
By oil of anointment, by military prowess, by cunning and even by
deceit and betrayal, he is now a king, a ruler ensconced in a residence
that demonstrated his power and command. By David’s logic,
how could it be right for him to have such a throne, while the Lord’s
presence and favor was only to be expressed in a traveling ark,
in a tent? “How should I live in a house of cedar but the
ark of God stays in a tent?” The Lord’s answer through
the prophet Nathan reveals the ambiguity in David’s proposal.
Should the Lord be “domesticated”—housed? The
Hebrew text plays on the word for house—as is clear when the
Lord responds to David’s plan. “You want to build ME
a house. I will build YOU one—I will make you a house (a dynasty,
including a future ruler who will be the Lord’s specially
chosen one). But the Lord--could the Lord of Hosts be housed? The
Lord who was on the move with the people of Israel, from Egypt?
There was no need for a temple in Sinai, in the desert, not in Canaan.
With the establishment of the royal city—with
all the dangers that a king presented, in terms of reducing the
people to servitude, to imposing the burdens of taxes, and the violence
implied in a standing army—was David forgetting that from
the very beginning, the people of the covenant were at root aliens,
strangers? Abraham, the father of the people, was a wandering Aramean,
coming into a strange land. Joseph through his brothers winds up
in Egypt—and we know then the years of exile and final exodus.
That memory of Exodus was the defining experience, whereby the people
remember their days of captivity, and remember they became people
in strange lands, on the move. The very symbol of God’s wondrous
and sustaining presence--the Ark of the Covenant—was a symbol
of a divine power unbound by territorial restraints, a holy presence,
a Shekinah, on the move into strange and alien lands. David’s
own great grandmother—Ruth—was famously an alien, a
stranger who proved herself more faithful than the native born.
And David—how many years he lived as a fugitive from the wrath
of Saul, living even as an alien among the Philistines. David was
not the one to build such a house; that would be left to his successor,
Solomon.
Can any one claiming the heritage
of the people of the Exodus forget that they were aliens?
Reflections of the reading from Ephesians
Then we turn to our first reading: the writer
of the letter to the Ephesians repeats a central Pauline message—that
in the new reality initiated by Jesus, the barrier between Jew and
the Ethnics (the Greek word we’ve come to hear as Gentile)
has been broken down. Remember the temple that David wanted to build?
In the temple of the first century of the Christian era, (“Solomon’s
Temple” as rebuilt—by Herod), in this massive structure,
before you could enter the area for sacrifices, before the more
sacred symbols of the presence of the Lord —there was a barrier
wall that separated the court of the Gentiles from the inner courts
into which only the “circumcised” could enter. The barrier
was serious: Ethnics were forbidden to enter under pain of death.
Only the people of the promise could go up into the sacred grounds.
The writer emphasizes that we who are not born into the people of
the covenant, the people of Israel, we ethnics by birth, we were
aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, strangers to the covenant.
But that barrier has been broken down—that sign saying “stay
out” has been torn down. Now both the original heirs to the
promise, and we recent immigrants, newcomers to the covenant—have
become co-citizens. Listen to the language of this reading: we aliens,
strangers have become citizens with the saints, members of the household
of God. The writer calls us “sym-politai” - co-participants
in the same polity, members of the same city-- fellow-citizens of
a new commonwealth. The Pauline writer states we have become equals
in the new humanity that the writer calls “the household of
God”---the very phrase that carries the double meaning of
“temple” and household, the same double meaning we heard
in the reading from Samuel. We ethnics have become heirs to the
promise, without the ritual sign of the citizen, the required circumcision.
Before becoming citizens of this new commonwealth, the Pauline letter
describes us as “without God, without hope”—people
wandering without a home, without a future. But it remains true
that we have been granted citizenship, with the original citizens
of Israel. We have undeservedly come to share that original blessing.
We have been granted a new citizenship as a gift. No passports,
no quotas, no immigration or custom procedures, no requirements
of birth or national origin. Only by grace, by the wonder of God’s
love, have we become newly enrolled citizens in God’s commonwealth.
But we have been aliens. We need to remember.
Do we really sense, experience ourselves as aliens,
as one’s granted citizenship in a new commonwealth not by
birth but by an act of inclusion? Do we see ourselves as the Pauline
writer invites us to do, as aliens? Do we realize that we are “newcomers”?
If we believed that, how would we then treat the other “aliens”
in our lives? Do most of us even have any experience as aliens,
as strangers? We’ve heard the cliché, that as Americans
we are a nation of immigrants. I don’t believe that the First
Nation, the Native Americans see themselves that way. We may have
been a nation of immigrants, aliens coming into a new country. But
we can also experience amnesia of that reality. Americans travel
a lot—Carroll and I just returned from a glorious trip to
Alaska—but vacation traveling or adventure traveling is not
the same as being an alien, unless the security of travel breaks
down or the travelers immerse themselves in the new country. Tourists
can experience another place, another culture, but they know they
are on a return trip home. An alien has come into a new country,
a new culture—and is there. Not passing through,
not protected by embassy or tour group. An alien has not become
assimilated. I can’t find many times in my life when I experienced
being “other” or alien. Maybe in Chicago, I had some
analogous experience of being an alien—when I moved out of
the enclave surrounding the University of Chicago and ventured into
the reality of South Side Chicago. A sense of not knowing the social
clues, feeling that I just couldn’t be at ease, looking for
kindly faces, depending on the kindness of strangers. Maybe some
of us remember the strangeness of being brand new in a college dorm—cut
off from home, not knowing anyone, looking clueless. Nothing like
the experience of a day laborer from Guatemala, afraid of La Migra,
looking for work, but fearful that he’s not going to be paid—knowing
only smatterings of English. Not like the family here from Afghanistan,
looked at suspiciously for their strange sounding names, wondering
if they are suspected of being terrorist sympathizers. Not like
the Iranians who run a family restaurant, but carefully call the
cuisine “Persian.” Not like the legally papered aliens
who must rely on free medical clinics or emergency rooms because
they can’t afford insurance. Who else do we encounter as aliens,
as strangers in a strange land? Are gay and lesbian persons, gay
and lesbian couples labeled and treated as aliens, as undesirable
“others”? Do we encounter people even here within our
Christian community who feel themselves to be if not “aliens”
at least to be alienated—ill at ease, needing a welcoming
face, an outstretched hand, an understanding, listening presence?
We can be glad to have the opportunity to support
such efforts as the Latino Outreach Program of CMR, and be thankful
that we can offer our space to that program which so helps recent
neighbors learn English. We can praise and support such efforts
as CASA of Maryland that extends such care and assistance to struggling
newcomers. We can praise and support the Kaseman Health Initiative,
extending medical care to the uninsured in our community, and to
Mercy Clinic in Germantown that freely serves so many uninsured.
We can extend hospitality and welcome to all who come—looking
beyond the barriers of race, gender, sexual orientation or identity.
If we remember that we have been aliens, will not our hearts be
opened always to the stranger, the newcomer, the one who is different?
If we so remember, then perhaps the concluding words of today’s
excerpt from Ephesians might ring true of us as RUC: we might become
“a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you are built together
spiritually into a dwelling place for God.” We might be that
holy place where the reality of the divine is encountered.
So let it be. Amen.
|